<% ImgSrc = "/images/h_ls_part.GIF" %>

NOT COPPING IT
June 1998


What happened?

A female police officer has successfully brought an action for sex discrimination against the Victorian Police in the Victorian Anti-Discrimination Tribunal. Senior Constable Narell McKenna claimed that she had been sexually harassed, suffered discrimination, and been victimised while working as a police officer at the Bairnsdale police station in country Victoria.

Ms McKenna is the first female police officer, still serving, to bring a case to the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal against the police force. She claimed that she had endured physical and emotional mistreatment because of her sex, that she had not been promoted as she deserved, and that a bogus disciplinary charge had been brought against her.

Before she arrived at Bairnsdale she had been given excellent performance assessments by her superiors, who had variously described her as conscientious and dedicated. She was supported in her application by the Victoria Police Association. The police, represented by a Queen's Counsel, vehemently denied the accusations, producing evidence that alleged McKenna was difficult to work with and subject to outbursts. The police brought to the hearing other female officers who had served at Bairnsdale, who, with one exception, uniformly described the atmosphere as friendly.

What is discrimination?

There are laws in each Australian State that deal with allegations of discrimination - but what exactly is discrimination, and how do you know if you have a legal claim against someone because of "discrimination"?

In general, discrimination occurs when a person's rights or opportunities have been denied because of their sex, religion, marital status, race, disability etc. As you might have already guessed, this is a lot easier said than proved in a court (or tribunal).

Where do you go?

The allegations against the police were made by Ms McKenna under the Victorian Equal Opportunity Act. There are similar rights in other States, for example, in New South Wales you would go to the Anti-Discrimination Board.

You can also make the same allegations under Human Rights and Equal Opportunity legislation. Anyone who believes they have suffered discrimination should generally get legal advice and/or complain to their State equal opportunity body (like the Equal Opportunity Commission or Anti-Discrimination Board). The case by Ms McKenna is a good example of an allegation of sex discrimination.

What is sexual harassment?

You hear this term a lot, but it is rarely explained, particularly with regard to legal sexual harassment. In general, it refers to some sort of unwelcome sexual advance or an unwelcome request for a sexual favour, in a situation where any reasonable person would realise it would cause intimidation or offence.

It includes sexual innuendo or inappropriate humour, for instance, offensive sexual material passed around an office or offensive jokes. For the law to take notice of it as a discrimination issue, it must occur in an employment or educational setting, or in relation to the provision of accommodation, some sort of service or the activities of clubs. Ms McKenna complained about harassment that she alleged occurred at her workplace.

Besides sexual harassment, employers are not allowed to discriminate against an employee because of their sex, whether it is to do with hiring and firing, a restriction or denial of promotion or opportunities (one of Ms McKenna's complaints).

How do you prove discrimination?

Good question! Usually you make a complaint to the equal opportunity body in your State, or the Commonwealth Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, and they investigate it. They will try to settle the complaint, but if this cannot be achieved, or you don't agree with the settlement, you can take the complaint to a specialist Tribunal.

Of course, you also have to prove that the discrimination actually occurred. For instance, if you complain that you were refused a promotion because of your sex, you can bet the employer will claim it was because of poor performance, or other reasons that would apply to any employee, whether male or female.

In the McKenna case, the police brought female police from the station who described the attitude of their employer as fair. But Ms McKenna also raised issues that were harder to refute: for instance, that she had been denied access to a four-wheel drive course and the opportunity to take duties at a "one-member" bush station. Her barrister brought out evidence that suggested these were traditionally considered to be duties better suited to male officers.

What the Tribunal said

The Tribunal awarded Ms McKenna $125,000 for "damages", for stress and suffering as a result of the discrimination - "damages" is a legal term for the monetary compensation given to someone by a court or tribunal.

This is a record compensation payment for a case of sexual discrimination. The Tribunal described the behaviour of the senior police officers as very serious, and found that Ms McKenna had unfavourable comments included in her employment record. The police later claimed that the Tribunal had not acknowledged the real efforts of the force to promote a workplace where harassment is not tolerated.

The police may appeal to the Supreme Court, but they can only do this on a "question of law", which means they have to find a problem with the way the Tribunal applied the law contained in the Equal Opportunity Act. In other words, they cannot simply say that the Tribunal made the wrong decision because they misinterpreted the facts, so it is a limited right of appeal.

No matter, because the message is quite clear - long gone are the days when discrimination will be tolerated in the workplace, and women who are prepared to express dissatisfaction with alleged discrimination may have a powerful ally in the law.

 

Read this: The legal information contained above is intended to be general information about the law. It is not a substitute for legal and other professional advice. Lawscape Communications P/L does not accept responsibility for loss to any person, who either acts or does not act because of this information.

Want us to tell you when we put out another news item?