<% ImgSrc = "/images/header_footy.GIF" %>

CYBERGAME (ESSENDON V CARLTON) 23/07/00
PART 10

Back Next

The next day the Essendon President and General Manager accompanied the club’s lawyer, Jason Hendriks, to the chambers of Queens Counsel Harry "Houdini" Ponsford. "Queen’s Counsel" is the title given to a senior barrister in recognition of outstanding work, and by some quirk of history, barristers’ offices are known as "chambers".

QCs usually charge more than other barristers, and Harry charged more than most – he had achieved his nickname defending a father of five in a well-publicised case that the prosecution had considered open and shut. Following Ponsford’s devastating cross-examination of a senior police detective, his client had been acquitted. From then on he was known as "Houdini".

"What are our options?" the President asked.

The QC was a supporter of Melbourne, and a member of the Melbourne Cricket Club, but he relished the opportunity to represent the young Essendon champion – he figured the case would attract tremendous publicity, the more the better. But he would have to be smart, the odds were against them.

"We could sue the AFL for damages, but I don’t think it will wash," he replied. "We should try and get a permanent injunction."

The President frowned. "Which means?"

"That we say they have breached the terms of the contract Evans signed and we want them to stop it."

If only it was that simple, he thought, though his clients would never know he had severe doubts about their chances. "We say that under the terms of the playing contract, the AFL had to comply with and observe the Rules of the League, which includes an obligation on the Tribunal to fairly hear the case against Evans. We’ll tie it all to the contract, that way we avoid a lot of haggling over the right of the courts to overturn Appeal Board decisions. We’ll say the decision of the Appeal Board was not just wrong, but it was a breach of contract and contrary to the best interests of the public, and that way we can also say the Appeal Board made a decision that is not based on the evidence and it was beyond their powers."

The next afternoon the AFL’s General Manager Football Operations paced back and forth outside the chambers of Lawrence Martin QC, known by his fellow lawyers as "Larry the Lip" for his courtroom propensity to make a speech when a sentence would suffice. They understood it was a tactic to unsettle his opposition – in his chambers he tended to be concise to the point of rudeness.

When the QC arrived thirty minutes later he did not bother to apologise for his tardiness. "Come in, gentlemen," he said, ushering the General Manager and the AFL solicitor into the musty room. With its antique cracked leather chairs and lithographs it reminded the General Manager of Jimmy Stewart’s doctor’s surgery in the film "The Duellist".

Lawrence Martin poured a scotch and sat behind his carved mahogany desk. Typically, he did not pause for pleasantries. "They don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell."

The General Manager waited for an elaboration. "Why?" he asked, feeling a little foolish.

Martin turned the small crystal glass in his hand. He was hoping to be behind the wheel of his Jaguar V8 XJ before the peak hour rush. "Look, I’ll put it as simply as I can. The only duty of the Tribunal is to act honestly, even moreso since the advent of the Appeal Board, because the players have a second bite at the cherry. That’s it. If the Board came to its decision honestly, they can squeal as long and hard as they like."

"What about natural justice?" asked the AFL solicitor.

Martin chuckled. "Leave it to me, gentlemen. The Supreme Court is my MCG."

Return

Back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  Next